占领华尔街

The big questions raised by anti-capitalist protests
资本主义的大问题


FT首席经济评论员马丁•沃尔夫:金融危机爆发四年多,才兴起反资本主义抗议。抗议者提出了一些重大问题,相信民主政治与市场经济组合的人必须解决当前的事态,避免历史悲剧重演。

Why did it take so long? It is over four years since the financial crisis began. Yet only now are anti-capitalist protests emerging, including at St Paul's Cathedral. So is this the beginning of a resurgent leftwing politics? I doubt it. Are the protesters raising some big questions? Yes, they are.

为什么如此之久?金融危机爆发至今已有4年多的时间,但直到现在,才兴起反资本主义抗议(抗议波及到了圣保罗大教堂)。那么,这是不是左翼政治复兴的开端呢?我对此表示怀疑。抗议者是否提出了一些重大问题?是的,的确如此。

For this to be the beginning of a new leftwing politics, two things have to occur: first, a credible new ideology must emerge; second, some social force must march behind it.

这股浪潮要成为新左翼政治的开端,必须具备两个因素:第一,必须出现一种令人信服的新意识形态;第二,在这种意识形态的背后必须存在着某种社会力量。

In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the ideology was socialism and the force was organised labour. Socialism failed as a way of running economies. It did, however, succeed in establishing welfare states. Socialism is a conservative force, dedicated to defending entitlements built up over a century. Meanwhile, organised labour is only strongly entrenched in the public sector. This gives it the same conservative agenda: defending the welfare state. Strikes by UK public sector workers against the fiscal cuts will demonstrate this.

19世纪到20世纪初,新涌现的意识形态是社会主义,背后的力量则是有组织的工人。社会主义作为一种经济管理方式以失败告终,但它成功地建立起了福利国家。社会主义是一股保守力量,致力于捍卫一个多世纪以来逐步争取到的权利。另一方面,工人组织仅在公共部门确立起了牢固的地位。这赋予它同样的保守使命:维护福利国家。英国公共部门工人针对财政削减计划发起的罢工,就可说明这一点。

您已阅读21%(1363字),剩余79%(5052字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×